top of page
  • Graham Balmforth

So Tory Rishi or Labour Keir - who will be helping the NHS more?

Updated: Apr 17

Medical Solicitor NHS
Politicians and the NHS - Bee with Honey or Spider with Fly?

Government Efforts: Labour vs. Conservative in Improving Health Budgets

One of the primary responsibilities of any government is to ensure the well-being of its citizens, and a significant aspect of this responsibility lies in healthcare.

How governments allocate funds to the health sector speaks volumes about their priorities and commitments to public welfare. In this article, we'll explore and compare the efforts of Labour and Conservative governments in improving health budgets, analysing their policies, strategies, and the resulting impact on healthcare services.

Labour Government Initiatives:

Labour governments, historically known for their emphasis on social welfare, have often prioritised healthcare spending. They are of course, never more than a sentence away from reminding us the modern welfare state is their invention and the NHS was their initiative, however, have they kept the momentum in the last 60 years? During their tenures, Labour administrations have certainly introduced various policies aimed at bolstering health budgets and improving healthcare accessibility.

1. Investment in Infrastructure:

Labour governments have, it is fair to say, consistently emphasised infrastructure development within the healthcare sector. They have allocated substantial funds to upgrade existing hospitals, build new healthcare facilities, and modernise medical equipment.

By investing in infrastructure, Labour aims to enhance the quality of healthcare services and accommodate the growing healthcare needs of the population. At least that is the blurb. The reality of the investment is that it has had little perceived impact on infrastructure in primary care and GP services have visibly declined under the weight of an increasing population during labour tenures in office.

2. Focus on Primary Care:

Labour administrations have though, placed a significant emphasis in their rhetoric on strengthening primary care services. Initiatives such as increasing the number of general practitioners, expanding community health centres, and investing in preventive healthcare measures have been cornerstones of their healthcare policies.

By prioritising primary care, Labour aims to alleviate pressure on secondary and tertiary healthcare facilities while ensuring early intervention and disease prevention. Increasing waiting lists and the failure of most GP practices to keep up with the administrative demands of the attention have had a negative effect though, health consumers have seen the open door policy of emergency departments as a portal for instant healthcare attention. The result has been catastrophic.

3. Expansion of Public Health Programs:

Labour governments have introduced extensive public health programs targeting various health issues, including mental health, obesity, and smoking cessation. These programs often involve partnerships with healthcare providers, non-profit organisations, and local communities to deliver comprehensive healthcare services.

By investing in public health initiatives, Labour seeks to address underlying health determinants and promote overall well-being. This has been arguably labours biggest advance. The screening policies for smoking cessation and obesity had their genesis under labour initiatives and whilst that has continued through both government's it is unarguably a great victory for public health.

Conservative Government Initiatives:

Conservative governments typically advocate for fiscal responsibility and market-oriented solutions. Which has been impactful if not least in the pushback from senior clinicians who have similarly advocated the need for guidance on fundamental philosophy of healthcare approach given a tightening of the fiscal belt.

While the tory approach to healthcare funding may differ from that of Labour, Conservative administrations have also implemented strategies to improve health budgets and healthcare delivery.

1. Efficiency Measures and Cost-Cutting:

Conservative governments often prioritise efficiency measures and cost-cutting strategies within the healthcare sector. They may introduce reforms aimed at reducing bureaucratic inefficiencies, streamlining processes, and optimising resource allocation. In reality they strip function, destroy moral and tend toward a general view of disintegration and neglect.

By implementing these measures, Conservatives aim to maximise the value of healthcare spending and ensure fiscal sustainability. It would seem that they are the only supporters of this position.

2. Promotion of Private Sector Involvement:

Future Conservative administrations may advocate for greater involvement of the private sector in healthcare delivery. Already, thousands of support functions of the NHS are now contracted out and whilst that may seem harmless it has contributed to the confusion of the supply chain and damaged the overall command and control structure.

In future governments, they may introduce policies to encourage public-private partnerships even further, outsourcing certain healthcare services, or expanding the role of private health insurance. There have been hints that the NHS far from being privatised will simply become the public purchasing arm of several healthcare company services funded by individual insurance arrangements leveraging the resources and expertise of the private sector, Conservatives often repeat the mantra thereto that the aim is to "enhance healthcare access and efficiency".

3. Emphasis on Innovation and Technology:

Conservative governments often prioritise innovation and technology adoption within the healthcare sector. They may allocate funds for research and development, promote the use of digital health solutions, and incentivise technological advancements in medical treatments.

By embracing innovation, Conservatives aim to improve healthcare outcomes, drive economic growth, and maintain global competitiveness.

A Comparative Analysis?

Analysing the impact of Labour and Conservative governments on health budgets requires considering various factors, including funding levels, policy effectiveness, and healthcare outcomes.

While Labour governments tend to prioritise increased funding and social welfare initiatives, Conservative governments may focus on efficiency measures and private sector involvement.

Labour's emphasis on public healthcare investment and primary care expansion can lead to improved access and quality of services, particularly for vulnerable populations. However, critics may argue that Labour's approach could result in higher tax burdens and increased government intervention in healthcare.

On the other hand, Conservative policies aimed at efficiency and private sector involvement may lead to cost savings and innovation within the healthcare system.

However, concerns may arise regarding equity of access, as increased privatisation could exacerbate disparities in healthcare access and quality.

Both Labour and Conservative governments have made efforts to improve health budgets and healthcare delivery, albeit with differing approaches.

Labour tends to prioritise increased public investment and social welfare initiatives, while Conservatives focus on efficiency measures and private sector involvement.

Ultimately, the effectiveness of government efforts in improving health budgets depends on a combination of funding levels, policy implementation, and healthcare outcomes.

Regardless of political affiliation, the primary goal should be to ensure equitable access to high-quality healthcare services for all citizens, while also maintaining fiscal sustainability and promoting innovation.

10 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All


bottom of page